Sunday, February 23, 2020

Isabella Linton, strong or weak character of the novel Wuthering Essay

Isabella Linton, strong or weak character of the novel Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte - Essay Example Her initial character weaknesses are naivety and childishness. These are manifest, later on, in her impetuous decision to marry. Of course, given her relatively tender age, eighteen at the time, these character traits are not as weak as they would be in an adult with more experience. Her experience, it must also be noted, does not extend much, if at all, beyond Thrushcross Grange. It must also be conceded that Ellen presents some positive attributes. Isabella, for instance, is naà ¯ve and a bit foolish, but she is not stupid. Quite the contrary, she has a clever wit and deep feelings. In short, Isabella is neither weak nor strong in the very beginning; however, her weaker traits, such as an infantile-like impetuousness, are dominant. These traits foreshadow a mistake in judgment. Indeed, with her marriage to Heathcliffe, this is precisely what happens. Later, when Isabella becomes infatuated with Heathcliffe, her foolishness becomes her dominant character trait to the exclusion of all other traits. Catherine teases and warns her about wanting to be with Heathcliffe. Isabella responds by stating that, â€Å"I wont be always sent off!†, and that â€Å"You are a dog in the manger, Cathy, and desire no one to be loved but yourself!† (Wuthering Heights). The facts are irrelevant for Isabella. She is jealous and desirous. Here, Isabella’s impetuous character speeds her demise and exacerbates her powerlessness. She concludes one particular rant by stating that, All, all is against me: she has blighted my single consolation. But she uttered falsehoods, didnt she? Mr. Heathcliffe is not a fiend: he has an honorable soul, and a true one, or how could he remember her?† (Wuthering Heights). It is true that Catherine is not disinterested in Heathcliffe; however, her advice and her warnings are sound and reliable. Isabella refuses to listen because she succumbs to the

Friday, February 7, 2020

Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 3

Research Paper Example However, the application of alternative dispute resolution methods significantly reduces cost incurred in solving such disputes among many other benefits that are accrued by parties who resort on applying these techniques. This research paper will explore the alternative dispute resolution in contracting, highlights their advantages and/or disadvantages, recommend steps to prepare for each type of action, and discuss how legally binding the decided outcome of each ADR may be for the parties involved. Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") in contracting refers to the alternative methods of helping the parties resolve legal problems before going to court (Nolan-Haley, 2013). According to American Arbitration Association and Fordham University (2006), ADR refers to the numerous methods that are used to solve disputes without involving the conventional court system. They are associated with numerous benefits such as being less expensive and timely than formal trials as well as providing the needed privacy for discreet matters. Moreover, ADR processes help in maintaining relations with strategic business partners, and provide more flexible and creative resolutions to disputes. Almost all ADR processes involve autonomous third person referred to as a â€Å"neutral†, who attempts to constrict the areas of conflict or solve them (Sourdin, 2011). There are four main types of ADR namely negotiation, mediation, collaborative law, and arbitration (Nolan-Haley, 2013). Negotiation is one of the less formal and most simple types of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). It involves starting a dialogue between the conflicting parties with the primary motive being to attain understanding, gain advantage in results of dialogue, or resolve points of difference (Sourdin, 2011). During a negotiation, disputants meet informally whether in the presence of a council or not, in an attempt to resolve their differences. In some cases, courts give the disputants an